Monday, November 23, 2009
J. D. Lees Was Right
On the global warming matter, as an aside, a few years ago G-FAN editor and publisher J. D. Lees (who is a high school science teacher in Canada) wrote in the magazine that climate change was bogus.
His comment drew some flak from those who either didn't agree with his point-of-view or just didn't want real life injected into a magazine on Japanese science-fiction and fantasy films.
With the release of the hacked emails from scientists claiming global warming is manmade (notice how they ignore the fact that the earth has been cooling since 1998), it appears that J. D. Lees was right.
Who is having the last laugh now?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
but what does Andy Williams think?
This changes nothing about the accepted consenus about climate change among the scientific community. I quote 2 sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html
"The evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so widely accepted that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument."
And for the best vocal explanation:
http://www.wnyc.org/flashplayer/player.html#/play/%2Fstream%2Fxspf%2F144489
Go to 5:55
Writer Marcel Theroux explains that you cannot find any scientist having his conclusions against the existance of climate change printed in any respectable scientific journal.
These emails do not change the data. This is like saying you have proof of the existance of God because you hacked Mother Theresa text messages. This is more TMZ than MIT.
Sorry, Maxie, there's been no "global warming" since 1998.
No wonder no "scientist having his conclusions against the existance of climate change printed in any respectable scientific journal" as it has been shown that the scientists who are promoting this fraud manipulated the data and suppressed data with a contrary conclusion. They're the ones who have kept the skeptics' conclusions from those journals.
Small wonder Al Gore refuses to debate the issue.
You may want to read this Wall St. Journal article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
Post a Comment