NO! To Mail-In Voting

The Democrats are hell-bent on having universal mail-in balloting during the November elections. This does not come as any surprise since they are the party of election fraud.

Some states are sending ballots out helter skelter with virtually no controls. This will lead to mass voter fraud. And it has already happened.

Liberal media outlets and their so-called "fact-check" websites are trying to discount mail-in voting fraud. But the evidence is there for all to see.

From the Heritage Foundation:

Even during the coronavirus pandemic that has so disrupted our lives, it would be a mistake to go to an all-mail election. Concerns that Trump has raised about mail-in voting are based on documented problems we have seen with such voting. 

Mail-in ballots are the ballots most vulnerable to being altered, stolen, or forged. Just look at the current investigation going on in Paterson, New Jersey, over a recent municipal election conducted entirely by mail. 

Four Paterson residents have already been charged with criminal election fraud, including a councilman and councilman-elect. Evidence is surfacing of everything from voters reporting that they never received their absentee ballots (even though they are recorded as having voted) to accusations that one of the campaigns may have submitted fraudulent ballots. 

Mail-in ballots also have a higher rejection rate than votes cast in person. In the Paterson case, election officials apparently rejected 1 in 5 ballots for everything from signatures on the ballots not matching the signatures of voters on file, to ballots not complying with the technical rules that apply to absentee ballots. 

New York, which has taken more than a month to count the ballots from its June 23 primary election, is also reporting a similar rejection rate. This should be considered unacceptable by anyone believing in fair and accurate elections.

During his press conference the other day, President Donald Trump stated that he does not object to people voting via absentee ballots, but not by universal mail-in ballots. That is why he is refusing to approve funds to cover mail-in balloting. If there's no funds, there's no mail-in balloting to process.

That's the issue.

If one wonders the difference between absentee ballots and the mail-in ballots the Democrats want, Rush Limbaugh last week described the two:

We'd be foolish to allow universal mail-in voting!