Trump Answers BLM's Newsome

President Trump has answered Black Lives Matter leader Hank Newsome's threats.

CNS News reported:

(CNSNews.com) - "I just want black liberation and black sovereignty by any means necessary," Hank Newsome, the head of Black Lives Matter for Greater New York, told Fox News's Martha MacCallum Wednesday night. 

Pointing to the American Revolution, Newsome said this country was born in violence and it now exports violence by blowing up other countries. Newsome indicated that his group is operating in that tradition:

"If this country doesn't give us what we want then we will burn down this system and replace it. All right. And I could be speaking figuratively, I could be speaking literally. It's a matter of interpretation."

Sounds like he's making threats on once side of his mouth and trying to (at the same time) weasel out of them on the other side of his mouth.

President Trump didn't mince any words in his reply on Twitter:

Sure is, Newsome's mealy mouth aside.

To read more, go here.

Trump Shares "Treason" Image

President Trump re-tweeted an image (above) this morning that is certain to send Democrats into a frenzy.

According to The Hill:

President Trump on Wednesday morning shared an image calling for his opponents to face trial for "treason," with many of them behind bars. 

The image, which the president retweeted from a pro-Trump Twitter account, depicts a host of figures Trump has criticized, including former President Obama, 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, special counsel Robert Mueller, former FBI Director James Comey and former President Bill Clinton.  

"Now that Russia collusion is a proven lie, when do the trials for treason begin?" the caption on the photo reads. 

While I agree with the general sentiment, the correct term for the activities the Democrats have been engaging in fall under the sedition law, not treason.

To read more, go here.

The Looney Left Report: The Left's Unhinged Hysteria

The Looney Left Report

The media, Democrat Party, some squishy Republicans have been besides themselves over the Helsinki press conference of President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Some are even calling Trump a traitor for not backing the intelligence community. This is funny (as well as ironic) as these are the same people who have been engaging in sedition against Trump for the past year and a half.

Trump today said he misspoke when he said:

"My people came to me...they said they think it's Russia. I have President Putin, he just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be" Russia.

"The sentence should have been 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be' Russia."

Still why should he trust some in the intelligence community? Many of them are Obama holdovers and devoted leftists.

Rush Limbaugh said this today:

What rational human being would think he could trust these people? What rational human being would think he could trust Andrew McCabe, James Comey, Peter Strzok, or any of that crowd, Nellie Ohr, her husband, Bruce Ohr, what rational person, the subject of a search-and-destroy campaign for two years, would then turn around and trust these people to have his best interests at heart? 

If you’re Donald Trump and you know that the entirety of the Washington establishment has been trying to undermine and sabotage your presidency, your election and your transition, and that they have been singularly trying to get you thrown out of office and have your election ruled invalid, why in the world would you trust any of them? That’s irrational! 

It is perfectly sensible for Donald Trump not to trust these people. These are all people that worked for Barack Hussein Obama. I’m sure Trump has intelligence people in his administration that he trusts. I’m sure by now after a year and a half Trump has a group of security advisers — NSA, who knows where they are — but that he trusts them. 

But why should he trust any of these people, from a former CIA member here to the former DIA member there that’s been all over cable news saying Donald Trump is a wretched example of humanity, why should Donald Trump trust any of them, and why should Donald Trump say even nice things about them?

Besides irrational, these people have been engaging in sedition. Also, it is phony outrage.

As Rush pointed out:

Ladies and gentlemen, the Democrat Party in this country used to sleep overnight with Soviets and Russians. They used to be in bed with each other against Ronald Reagan. The idea that the Democrats are outraged that somebody would not treat Vladimir Putin as an enemy of America is just simply silly! It wasn’t that long ago where the Democrat Party hated the CIA, hated the intelligence community, and loved Soviet, and Cuban, and Chinese communists! 

Now all of a sudden, the Democrat Party loves the intelligence community and hates the Russians? Come on, folks. It’s all made up! That’s why it’s unrealistic. They’re exaggerating it. None of this is real. There isn’t any real outrage. It’s all faux and manufactured, and that’s why they’re taking it over the top. That’s why it appears unhinged and hysterical, because it is! It’s a bunch of untrained actors trying to act the part, and they’re goin’ way overboard.

Ex-CIA Director Calls For Coup If Trump Fires Mueller

The Looney Left Report

It is probably a good thing that we have the Second Amendment as the Looney Left is calling for a coup should President Donald Trump fires special prosecutor Robert Mueller, who is "investigating" the phony Russian collusion charges.

Zero Hedge reported:

In the most vocal opposition to president Donald Trump yet, former CIA Director John Brennan said that if the White House tries to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, government officials should refuse to follow the president orders, as they would be - in his view - “inconsistent” with the duties of the executive branch. 

"I think it's the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future," Brennan told CNN's Wolf Blitzer at the Aspen Security Forum, effectively calling for a coup against the president should Trump give the order to fire Mueller.

This is being discussed as I type this blog by Rush Limbaugh. It is about time these Deep State wackos are brought on sedition charges.

I must remind you of something. Former CIA Director John Brennan voted for the Communist Party candidate in the 1976 presidential election.

To read more, go here.

Pat Buchanan: Are We Nearing Civil War?

Above, Patrick J. Buchanan.

The craziness coming from the Left is nowhere anywhere abating. The Left ratchets up the attacks everyday.

Columnist Patrick J. Buchanan is wondering if we are headed into civil war.

In his column today at CNSNews, Buchanan wrote:

President Trump may be chief of state, head of government and commander in chief, but his administration is shot through with disloyalists plotting to bring him down. 

We are approaching something of a civil war where the capital city seeks the overthrow of the sovereign and its own restoration. 

Thus far, it is a nonviolent struggle, though street clashes between pro- and anti-Trump forces are increasingly marked by fistfights and brawls. Police are having difficulty keeping people apart. A few have been arrested carrying concealed weapons.

That the objective of this city is to bring Trump down via a deep state-media coup is no secret. Few deny it.

Last week, fired Director of the FBI James Comey, a successor to J. Edgar Hoover, admitted under oath that he used a cutout to leak to The New York Times an Oval Office conversation with the president.

Goal: have the Times story trigger the appointment of a special prosecutor to bring down the president.

Comey wanted a special prosecutor to target Trump, despite his knowledge, from his own FBI investigation, that Trump was innocent of the pervasive charge that he colluded with the Kremlin in the hacking of the DNC.

As I blogged yesterday, a nutjob Democrat congressman from the People's Republic of California, Brad Sherman, introduced an Article of Impeachment against President Trump. 

To read more, go here.

The Looney Left Report: MSM Loons Trying To Destroy Trump

THE LOONEY LEFT REPORT

The left-wing lunatics who populate the newsrooms of the nation's media and newspapers have given up any pretense of impartiality or non-bias when it comes to President Donald Trump. In fact, they are opening trying to overthrow him.

The Washington Times reported:

Now anything goes. All restraints are loosened, all self-discipline trashed. There’s no cure or even treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome, a disease as wild and as swiftly lethal as anything imported from the Ebola River valley of the dark continent. The rules and taboos that once guided even the sleaziest excuse for a newspaper no longer apply. 

Destroying Donald Trump is all that matters in the newsrooms of the mainstream media, so called, and by any means necessary. Rarely have so many hysterics contributed so much of the national conversation.

The loons of the left had better watch their backs. If, by a fluke of chance, they are successful in a coup, a good percentage of the 62 million Trump voters will be out for their blood (do you really think they'd sit idly by and let it happen?).

To read more, go here.

Prosecute Them For Sedition!

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy 

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

From riots brought by Black Lives Matter, UC Berkeley radicals and others to Barack Obama's "shadow government" by sabotaging the Trump Administration and the financing of these and other acts by radical billionaire George Soros, it is time to arrest and PROSECUTE these conspirators under the sedition statute of the United States.

As National Review wrote:

From time to time over the years, the eminent historian Daniel Pipes has lamented that treason, not just as a crime but as a concept, appears defunct in the West. The question of bringing treason charges against jihadists has been raised from time to time. Often its very asking proves Dr. Pipes’s point: Most radical Islamic terrorists are not American citizens; as to them, treason is not a cognizable offense because traitorous conduct is central to the crime.  

Even against American jihadists, a treason charge is of dubious usefulness. The 1996 overhaul of federal counterterrorism law codified crimes tailored to terrorism that are easier to prove than treason. The aim of an indictment in a national-security case should be the surest route to the severest sentence. The point is not to teach a civics lesson, regrettable as our education system’s default has been in that regard.  

Yet what is true of treason is not true of sedition. There are charges to bring against those who would destroy our society. They should be brought. Case in point: the University of California at Berkeley. 

As our National Review editorial observed in the aftermath of this week’s Berkeley rioting, “there is within the American Left an increasingly active element that is not only deeply illiberal — fundamentally opposed to free speech — but also openly violent.” I’d further contend that the problem is not confined to this increasingly active element that is not only deeply illiberal — fundamentally opposed to free speech — but also openly violent.”

I’d further contend that the problem is not confined to this increasingly active element, the Left’s “progressives in a hurry.” Whether it is Berkeley or Benghazi, it is standard operating procedure among the most influential, most allegedly mainstream Democratic politicians to rationalize rioting as mere “protest.” In their alternative reality, violence in the name of sedition is “free speech” — a passionate expression of political dissent — while the actual political speech they so savagely suppress is the atrocity.

If evidence turns up that former President Barack Obama is involved in the sabotage of any federal agency by bureaucrats left over from his administration and/or aiding unlawful "protesters", then he should also be prosecuted and jailed if found guilty.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444596/berkeley-riots-sedition-laws