Rush: James Comey Was A Commie

Rush Limbaugh may be gone, but his radio show is still very relevant today.

Did you know that James Comey was a commie? Rush spells it out.

 

DID YOU KNOW COMEY WAS A COMMIE? RUSH DID

Rush Limbaugh: "I had never heard this about Comey. Now we find out that, under Obama, the CIA director and the FBI director both had histories of, not just flirtation, but serious immersion into communism. And like the KGB always said,… pic.twitter.com/tF5vJJKR0z

— The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show (@clayandbuck) October 8, 2025

Foreign Kickbacks To Senators and Representatives

This is sure to get interesting!

 

According to CIA: Nine U.S. Senators and twelve Representatives are currently under criminal investigation for allegedly accepting foreign lobbying kickbacks. All of these corrupt politicians are Dems.

Should they be required to resign immediately?

— Tulsi Gabbard Intelligence Report (@TulsiGabbardDNI) May 14, 2025

CIA Cover-Up On Havana Syndrome Attacks Alleged

Above, the US Embassy in Havana, Cuba during a drive-by. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

This really doesn't surprise me in the least.

Considering the shenanigans the CIA (and FBI) engaged in over the past several years, it would not surprise me that a cover-up is taking place on the "Havana Syndrome" attacks at the Havana, Cuba U.S. Embassy.

The Washington Times reported:

A former CIA officer who says she was attacked by some type of foreign energy weapon is charging the CIA with covering up the attacks.

The medically retired CIA officer, identified only as “Alice” because of her past agency work in Africa, revealed that she still suffers debilitating injuries after hearing a strange sound in her home in 2021, resulting in what the federal government is vaguely describing as an “anomalous health incident,” or AHI.

The malady, however, is known widely as Havana syndrome by the hundreds of U.S. diplomats, intelligence personnel and military members who say they have been afflicted after being posted overseas. An FBI agent also reported suffering head injuries from some type of energy device attack in the United States.

China and Russia are suspected of conducting the attacks that some analysts say are part of cognitive warfare — efforts to affect brain function. Sonic or microwave weapons are also suspected.

To read more, go here. 

Charlie Kirk On Ex-CIA Director John Brennan

Former Obama CIA director John Brennan says Tulsi Gabbard "doesn't have the right perspective" to be Director of National Intelligence.

So let's remind people:

-John Brennan voted for the Communist presidential candidate when in college.
-John Brennan lied under oath to the… pic.twitter.com/xKHfeVIMUq

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 14, 2024

Ex-CIA Agent Promoted to Meta/Facebook’s “Head of Election Policies”

If you thought that Mark Zuckerberg and company at Facebook/Meta will treat conservatives fairly in 2024 the elections, you'd best put that silly notion out of your head.

Zuckerberg and company has promoted an ex-CIA goon to "Head of Elections Policies". In other words, he will be in charge of censorship at Facebook.

From the Gateway Pundit:

As the Big-Tech censorship apparatus in social media continues to roll on at full steam ahead of the 2024 Election, a former 17-year veteran of the CIA, Aaron Berman, has reportedly been promoted to the “Head of Elections Policies” for Meta/Facebook.  Berman was a “Senior Analytic Manager (and various positions)” for the CIA from March 2002 thru July 2019.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, infamously donated $440 million to the CTCL and other non-profits, including ERIC-founder David Becker’s CEIR to help “supplement” elections during COVID.  This money disproportionately went to Democrat strongholds, especially in the key swing states.

Facebook/Meta was also one of the social media platforms mentioned by the “Election Integrity Partnership” (EIP) and Stanford Internet Observatory in a report, which promoted the censoring of hundreds of thousands of posts and conservative voices from discussing events that occurred around the highly-suspect 2020 Election.  The report published by the EIP, titled “The Long Fuse”, laid out, among other things, how the government and election officials could use the EI-ISAC as a “singular conduit” for reporting ‘misinformation’ to social media platforms in an attempt to subvert the First Amendment protections of US citizens against government censorship.

Ironically, as mentioned in the article below from The Gateway Pundit, the EI-ISAC, a subsidiary of the Center for Internet Security (CIS), was also engaged in “securing” elections at the county level through the Dept. of Homeland Security.  DHS offered free security services to county election jurisdictions, many of which accepted the offer.

The release of the Twitter Files revealed a plethora of former government bureaucrats, many of them former intel agency employees, that transitioned to leadership roles within the social media companies and were often responsible for the censoring of the respective platform’s users.  In continuing with that trend, Berman, who was previously the “senior product policy manager for misinformation” at Meta, has reportedly been promoted to the “Head of Elections Policies.”

To read more, go here and here.

FBI Counter Intelligence, Seth Rich and Twitter Files

It will be interesting when the House GOP begins their investigation on the involvement of the FBI and CIA in the 2020 elections. In the meantime, Twitter Files are shedding some light on DNC, FBI and CIA collusion during the election campaign.

Hopefully, there will be people jailed for this.

Before proceeding further, here's little refresher on the late Seth Rich.

From Wikipedia:

The murder of Seth Rich occurred on July 10, 2016, at 4:20 a.m. in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Rich died about an hour and a half after being shot twice in the back. The perpetrators were never apprehended; police suspected he had been the victim of an attempted robbery.

The 27-year-old Rich was an employee of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and his murder spawned several right-wing conspiracy theories,

Maybe those "right wing" conspiracy folks weren't too off the mark.

From the Gateway Pundit:

The stunning revelations from the Twitter files thanks to the work of Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger and Bari Weiss is providing irrefutable proof that the FBI was working to prevent the election of Donald Trump. When it comes to “Election Interference,” it was the FBI, not Russia.

The results released so far detail FBI giving direction to Twitter regarding the 2020 Presidential Campaign. I believe future releases will provide evidence that the FBI, along with the CIA, was working to destroy Donald Trump and prevent him from being elected.

One thing we know with certainty is that the FBI’s Washington Field Office was communicating via email and phone with the FBI Counter Intelligence division at FBI Headquarters about Seth Rich. The only reason the FBI Counter Intelligence division would be involved in any way with an alleged case of a routine murder following an attempted robbery of Seth Rich is because there was foreign involvement. The FBI is trying to bury that fact.

Why is the FBI stonewalling so furiously to keep its communications about Seth Rich and the alleged hack of the DNC by Russia secret? Because Russia did not hack the DNC. This is not my opinion. It is a conclusion of several cyber security professionals that flows from one very specific, easily tested claim made by the discredited Special Counsel, Robert Mueller –- i.e., that Guccifer 2.0 was a fictional identity created by Russian Military Intelligence, aka the GRU. If the GRU had concocted Guccifer 2.0, then the forensic evidence should show that this entity was operating from Russia or under the direct control of entities linked to the GRU.

One type of forensic evidence is meta data. What is meta data? This is geek shorthand to describe physical information or code that is written into a document created by a word processor software when a document is created. This data includes a variety of things, such as the date and time the document was created or modified. It tells you who created the document.

An examination of the Guccifer 2.0 documents  shows that the meta data in the Guccifer 2.0 documents were manipulated deliberately to plant Russian fignerprints. This was not an accident nor an oversight due to carelessness by some computer operator.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is correct in stating that Guccifer 2.0 was a “fictious online persona. ” But he is wrong to claim that Guccifer 2.0 was a creation of the  Russian Military Intelligence. Guccifer 2.0 appears to be a creation of the CIA and was one character in a broader scheme assembled to paint Donald Trump as a lackey of Vladimir Putin.

In view of the aforementioned, it is interesting that Mark Zuckerberg named his company Meta.

Meta Platforms, Inc., doing business as Meta and formerly named Facebook, Inc., and TheFacebook, Inc., is an American multinational technology conglomerate based in Menlo Park, California. The company owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, among other products and services.

It will be interesting to see if all this leads right to Zuckerberg's doorstep.

To read more, go here. 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Lauds Tucker Carlson

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised Fox News's Tucker Carson for his report on the CIA's involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy, calling it the "most courageous newscast in 60 years."

He posted on Twitter:

FBI-CIA Are Still Withholding 3% of The JFK Documents

Above, a view of Elm Street from a sixth floor window of the former Texas School Book Depository.
This window is two windows to the west of the actual sniper's window. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

To date, roughly 97% of the previously withheld classified JFK assassination documents have been released. Yesterday, 13,000 more were released.

There's 3% remaining. People are already asking, What are they hiding? 

Above, the sniper's next at the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

The Gateway Pundit has jumped into the fray.

They wrote:

In 2017 President Trump approved the release of approximately 2800 long-classified JFK assassination records.

News outlets from around the globe furiously combed through the files in search of more pieces to the puzzling death of President John F. Kennedy.

President Trump released a second trove of documents later that year.

One of the documents revealed that Democrat President Lyndon Johnson was a KKK member.

This was not a surprise.

The Ku Klux Klan was founded as the activist wing of the Democratic Party.

On Thursday the National Archives released thousands of the JFK documents.

But the FBI-CIA would not allow the release of all of the documents. Around 3% of the JFK documents are still being withheld from release to the public — more than 50 years after the assassination.

What are they hiding?

We know how trustworthy the CIA and FBI are these days, don't we?

To read more, go here. 

Why The JFK Assassination Files Still Haven't Been Fully Released

Above, Elm Street at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

In two more days, the 59th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy will be observed.

Incredible as it may seem, there's an inter-agency battle over the remaining classified documents and their release according to a 1992 transparency law ordering their release. The CIA and FBI want them kept secret, but the National Achives and Records Administration want them released. 

Politico has posted an article on might be the crux of the dispute.

They begin with:

Almost exactly 59 years after those rifle shots rang out in Dealey Plaza, left a president mortally wounded and changed the course of history, there are still secrets that the government admits it is determined to keep about the November 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. More than 14,000 classified documents somehow related to the president’s murder remain locked away, in part or in full, at the National Archives in clear violation of the spirit of a landmark 1992 transparency law that was supposed to force the release of virtually all of them years ago.

The fact that anything about the assassination is still classified — and that the CIA, FBI and other agencies have refused to provide the public with a detailed explanation of why — has convinced an army of conspiracy theorists that their cynicism has always been justified.

It appears the CIA, FBI and other agencies want to protect still-living foreign informants from reprisals by the Mafia (and possibly others) along with intelligence tools. That is why the battle still goes on.

Politico reported:

In the past, those agencies have provided the public with only vague explanations about their reasoning, citing potential damage to national security and foreign policy.

The Archives correspondence reveals, for the first time, their detailed justifications, providing a rare window into reasoning inside the CIA and FBI. In many cases, it shows, the CIA and FBI pressed to keep documents secret because they contained the names and personal details of still-living intelligence and law-enforcement informants from the 1960’s and 1970’s who could be at risk of intimidation or even violence if they were publicly identified.

Many of those sources — now elderly, if not close to death — are foreigners living outside the United States, which means it would be more difficult for the American government to protect them from threats. The CIA has also withheld information in the documents that identifies the location of CIA stations and safehouses abroad, including several that have been in use continuously since Kennedy’s death in 1963.

Even though it is almost 60 years since the assassination, it is interesting that intelligence and law-enforcement informants could still be put into jeopardy if their identities are revealed. At least, that's what the CIA and FBI contend. 

To read the full article, go here.

Speaking of the JFK assassination, a new proposal to improve Dealey Plaza has been released. To see what's in mind, go here.

UFO Encounters Left HUNDREDS of Servicemen With Brain Damage

Above, a display at the Roswell International UFO Museum. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

Now that the government is a little more forthcoming on the subject of UFOs, more information is coming out about incidents over the past 70s years. The following involves servicemen who suffered brain damage and death after UFO encounters.

This is from an ex-CIA officer.

According to My Patriot Post:

An ex-CIA officer and top forensic neuroimaging scientist has claimed that during his time working with the CIA, hundreds of servicemen suffered brain damage and some even died after encounters with UFOs.

Detroit Professor Christopher Green worked with the CIA since the 1960s and in 2010 he was commissioned to conduct research and to produce a report paper on behalf of a $22 million top secret defense program set up to monitor UFOs.

Green was assigned to study and record incidents which resulted in individual’s suffering injuries after close encounters with unidentified crafts.

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail, Green stated that “hundreds of patients” had sustained serious brain injuries and conditions after encountering mysterious unidentified crafts, and around one in ten died within seven years.

To read more, go here. 

CIA Declassifies THREE THOUSAND Documents On UFOs

Above, a display at the International UFO Museum in Roswell, New Mexico. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

An interesting article appeared in the U.K.'s Daily Mail January 12 while I was enjoying a little vacation in Texas.

The CIA declassified more than 700 files on UFOs.

They wrote:

• A dossier with more than 700 files about Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) was published on The Black Vault website on Thursday 

• Black Vault founder John Greenewald Jr spent two decades suing the CIA to release the records and then scanning the pages one by one 

• A DailyMail.com review of about one-tenth of the files in the Black Vault database revealed a few perplexing examples of UAP sightings 

• One of the reports describes how seemingly urgent UFO information was hand-delivered to the CIA's deputy director for science and technology in 1976 

• In another report, CIA officials discuss the possibility that UFOs were behind a 'mysterious blast' in the small Russian town of Sasovo in 1991

A treasure trove of newly-unsealed CIA records has revealed chilling accounts of hundreds of UFO sightings across the globe dating back to the 1950s - along with international intelligence agencies' efforts to understand them.  

The XXXX dossier with nearly 3,000 pages of documents about Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) - the government's official term for what are commonly called UFOs - was published on The Black Vault website last week.  

Thousands of paranormal enthusiasts have already started poring through the collection of more than 700 individual documents, according to Black Vault's founder John Greenewald Jr, who has spent the past two decades suing the CIA to release the records and then scanning the pages into his database one by one.  

The CIA purports that the files account for its 'entire' collection of declassified UAP intel, but Greenewald cautions that there's no way to verify that claim and has vowed to continue searching for further records.  

The dossier was released ahead of a June deadline for US intelligence agencies to reveal everything they know about UFOs to Congress under a clause slipped into the $2.3trillion coronavirus relief bill signed into law by President Donald Trump in December.   

Keep watching the skies!

To read more, go here. 

Retired Air Force General Blows Whistle On CIA's Vote-Hacking

 Retired Air Force General blows the whistle on the CIA vote-hacking:

The Navajo Code Talker

Above, radio equipment on display at the Navajo Nation Museum in Window Rock, Arizona. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

One of the more interesting things about the Pacific War in World War II was the use of Navajo Code Talkers.

In recent years, the Navajo Code Talkers' role during the war has been extensively celebrated. And rightly so.

According to the Central Intelligence Agency website:

Navajo Code Talkers and the Unbreakable Code

In the heat of battle, it is of the utmost importance that messages are delivered and received as quickly as possible. It is even more crucial that these messages are encoded so the enemy does not know about plans in advance. 

During World War II, the Marine Corps used one of the thousands of languages spoken in the world to create an unbreakable code: Navajo. 

World War II wasn’t the first time a Native American language was used to create a code. 

During World War I, the Choctaw language was used in the transmission of secret tactical messages. It was instrumental in a successful surprise attack against the Germans. 

Germany and Japan sent students to the United States after World War I to study Native American languages and cultures, such as Cherokee, Choctaw, and Comanche. 

Because of this, many members of the U.S. military services were uneasy about continuing to use Code Talkers during World War II. They were afraid the code would be easily cracked, but that was before they learned about the complexity of Navajo.

Above, "The Legendary Navajo Code Talker" statue at Window Rock Tribal Park. Photo by Armand Vaquer.

In Window Rock, Arizona, Navajo Code Talker equipment is on display at the Navajo Nation Museum and there is a statue of "The Legendary Navajo Code Talker" at the Window Rock Tribal Park. Window Rock is the capital of the Navajo Nation.

Near to my home in New Mexico is Fort Wingate. It was at Fort Wingate that the Navajo Code Talkers received training.

From Legends of America:

Most famous of Fort Wingate’s World War II contributions, however, were the Navajo code talkers who trained here. The code talkers baffled Japanese forces in the Pacific using a code based on the Navajo language.

Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan In A Panic

President Donald Trump has demanded that the Inspector General investigate any FBI/DOJ spying on his 2016 campaign for political purposes:

This prompted a rather panicked response from ex-CIA Director John Brennan:

The only harm done to our "democracy" (we're NOT a democracy, we are a republic) has been the chicanery done by the Democrats and Obama Administration officials in trying to rig the 2016 elections by turning the FBI and CIA into a KGB operation and have since tried to cover it all up. What has he got to hide? Hmm?

To read more, go here.

How Spies Avoid Attention While Traveling

Above, 'Q' reviews features of the special attache case with James Bond in From Russia With Love (1963).

The average traveler probably won't be traveling with an attache case with a built-in smoke bomb, a hidden dagger and gold sovereign coins or with a Walther PPK, but there's an interesting article by the Irish Independent on how spies travel without arousing suspicion by airport security.

They begin with:

Take it easy at the Christmas party if you plan to fly the next day. According to the CIA’s secret travel guide for spies, travellers with “shaking or trembling hands, rapid breathing for no apparent reason, cold sweats, pulsating carotid arteries, a flushed face, and avoidance of eye contact” will arouse suspicion. 

That is one of the hundreds of tips from the latest Wikileaks online revelation: a 14-page document called Surviving Secondary: An Identity Threat Assessment of Secondary Screening Procedures at International Airports. 

The guide was produced at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia by the organisation’s Identity and Travel Intelligence staff. Its mission: to tell CIA staff travelling with false papers on covert operations how to avoid being singled out for extra attention at airports. But the contents inadvertently also provide advice for hard-pressed frequent flyers keen to reduce hassle.

To read more, go here. 

More Evidence That Obama Administration Lied About Benghazi

New documents show that it was determined by the CIA in Benghazi knew within 24 hours that the attack on the embassy was by militants and not from any protest of an anti-Islam video.

According to MyWay.com:

WASHINGTON (AP) - The CIA station chief in Libya reported to Washington within 24 hours of last month's deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate that there was evidence it was carried out by militants, not a spontaneous mob upset about an American-made video ridiculing Islam's Prophet Muhammad, U.S. officials have told The Associated Press.

It is unclear who, if anyone, saw the cable outside the CIA at that point and how high up in the agency the information went. The Obama administration maintained publicly for a week that the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was a result of the mobs that staged less-deadly protests across the Muslim world around the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks on the U.S.

The Obama Administration knew (as the CIA and State Department are under the executive branch) the real cause of the attack, yet lied to the public that it was over an anti-Islam YouTube video.

Plus, requests were made by the consulate for additional security but were turned down by the State Department.

To read the full story, go here.

Obama: Another Jimmy Carter

The current events in Egypt exposed to the world the ineptness of the Obama Administration.

Case in point:

The term Muslim Brotherhood is an umbrella term for a variety of movements. In the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried al-Qaeda as a perversion of Islam.

This was said by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper at a congressional hearing yesterday.

This guy is totally out to lunch! Secular? Eschewed violence? This would be funny if it weren't such a serious matter.

Also, CIA Director Leon Panetta raised more eyebrows at a Capitol Hill hearing when he told lawmakers yesterday there was "a strong likelihood that Mubarak may step down this evening." Panetta stepped into it further when he said he was basing this on press reports. Press reports?! What did his intelligence people in Egypt tell him, if anything?

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak stepped down today in what amounts to a military coup. The Obama Administration has shown during the Egyptian crisis that friends can't rely on the support of the American government while in the hands of liberal Democrats. Just ask the Shah of Iran!

Like Jimmy Carter, Obama greased the skids for the downfall of a U.S. ally. In 1979, Carter greased the skids for the Shah's downfall and look at what took over. We continue to pay a heavy price over Carter's Iran debacle. Now we see a repeat of this involving Mubarak.

What will eventually take over power in Egypt? Will the new government be friendly to the U.S. and Israel? Or will it be hostile? This is a question that is of most concern.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, one of the arguments against the election of Barack Obama was that he would amount to being "Jimmy Carter's second term." It appears that this prediction is coming true.

Obama: just another Jimmy Carter.

Turning Down the Volume

CIA Director Leon Panetta has given the following message to CIA employees:

Message from the Director: Turning Down the Volume

There is a long tradition in Washington of making political hay out of our business. It predates my service with this great institution, and it will be around long after I’m gone. But the political debates about interrogation reached a new decibel level yesterday when the CIA was accused of misleading Congress.

Let me be clear: It is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress. That is against our laws and our values. As the Agency indicated previously in response to Congressional inquiries, our contemporaneous records from September 2002 indicate that CIA officers briefed truthfully on the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, describing “the enhanced techniques that had been employed.” Ultimately, it is up to Congress to evaluate all the evidence and reach its own conclusions about what happened.

My advice — indeed, my direction — to you is straightforward: ignore the noise and stay focused on your mission. We have too much work to do to be distracted from our job of protecting this country.

We are an Agency of high integrity, professionalism, and dedication. Our task is to tell it like it is — even if that’s not what people always want to hear. Keep it up. Our national security depends on it.

Bravo, Mr. Panetta! It's about time the agency was defended.

Gingrich: Pelosi Lied

What did Nancy Pelosi know and when did she know it?

ABC News is reporting that in an interview with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Gingrich stated that current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lied about not being briefed on the enhanced interrogation methods employed on captured terrorist suspects.

In an interview with ABC News Radio’s Marcus Wilson, Gingrich, R-Ga., said Pelosi, D-Calif., “has lied to the House” in claiming that she was never briefed by the CIA about the Bush administration’s use of waterboarding and other harsh tactics.

"I think she has lied to the House, and I think that the House has an absolute obligation to open an inquiry, and I hope there will be a resolution to investigate her. And I think this is a big deal. I don't think the Speaker of the House can lie to the country on national security matters,” Gingrich said.

He continued: "I think this is the most despicable, dishonest and vicious political effort I've seen in my lifetime."

"She is a trivial politician, viciously using partisanship for the narrowist of purposes, and she dishonors the Congress by her behavior."

Pelosi is claiming that she was never briefed, despite being a ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. CIA documents that surfaced last week refute Pelosi's claims. She knew about the methods, including waterboarding, but did not object. She is currently fighting for her political career and accused the CIA of misleading Congress.

Partisan Democrats in the Congress are pressing for investigations and prosecutions of Bush Administration attorneys over this issue. If seen as a collaborator, the hard Left will demand Pelosi's ouster.

To read the full article, go here.